Suggested by JO Josh Oakhurst 6 months ago
Recruiting has long suffered from the "black hole" where resumes go in and candidates do not come out. Good candidates are lost to the system being overwhelmed by unqualified or embellishing candidates. Keyword matching algorithms penalize good candidates who don't SEO their resume and reward bad candidates who do. Neither candidates nor recruiters are happy about the process.
Recruiters are getting flooded by AI generated resumes. Even before AI, recruiters have always complained about having to wade through so many unqualified applicants to get to the qualified ones.
New Idea
New Idea
New Idea
Existing Company
Existing Company
Co-Founder at ViaVote @ ViaVote
Been watching this thread with interest and appreciate everyone sharing their own ideas re: solutions. I wanted to share an update from my own research over the past 100 days tracking LinkedIn job postings across 265 metros in 46 states (note: AI-based evaluation isn’t perfect, but spot checks suggest these numbers are fairly accurate):
64,127 jobs were retrieved in total. Of these, 17,375 (27%) included minimum salary information.
Among postings with salary info, 5,386 (31%, 8.4% of total) included a base salary above the 2024 US median wage of $63,804. However, 2,320 of these required state licensing (e.g. RN, CPA, CDL, etc.).
Of the 3,064 remaining, 2,423 were posted directly by the company (i.e. not a third party recruiter) with 305 job titles reposted within the 100-day period.
Of these 2,118 distinct jobs, only five non-government entities had at least 10 active postings (Leidos, Procore, BNSF, American Heart Association, Google).
Bottom line: It’s tough out there, but it doesn’t need to be THIS tough -- knowing which companies are actually hiring external candidates can help reduce frustration on all sides.
Generative AI is a double-edged sword, allowing for mass customization and filtering by both recruiters and applicants alike. Based on recent conversations with business owners, these tools are getting scary good at summarization but remain much less helpful re: candidate-recruiter matching.
I am working on a multiple sieve approach incorporating AI filtering + human feedback to make ghost jobs a thing of the past. Current filters include:
Happy to set up a working group on this if others are interested -- politics aside, I think we can all agree it’s time to Make Job Postings Real Again :-)
Gaudete!
Luminary @ Lionessuccess
We Need Real Change in Hiring—Here’s the Truth
AI is great, but let’s be honest: the hiring process is broken. I’ve been on the job hunt too long, and I’ve lost it all—along with a bag of marbles, too. The number of ghost jobs being posted is outrageous. Legally, companies have to post job openings somewhere (thanks, EEOC), but guess what? More often than not, someone’s cousin’s aunt’s baby is already in training for that role while the rest of us are wasting time trying to impress faceless systems.
We need real people with real hearts in hiring. We need platforms like LinkedIn to actually help people—not AI-generated posts or automated responses. We need real communication. Real results. Real change.
People are losing hope. I’m tired of seeing talent wasted while folks live in trees or make desperate decisions just to survive. These aren’t just everyday workers—we’re talking about former executives, seasoned professionals, and skilled specialists who are being left behind. No one is listening to the human stories behind the applications.
Director of Talent Acquisition @ formerly with Activision/MSFT
Ohhh my goodness, you have really hit on a big and thorny issue. The current ATS systems most companies use now, are failing everyone on all sides of the experience. In house recruiting teams are flooded with inappropriate CV's. The state of CV sorting/qualification automation is really terrible in most ATS systems. So that leaves it to manual labor, in many cases handled by understaffed or undertrained TA teams. It's a space that is literally screaming out for AI to help with honing in on matched profiles. From the candidate side of things, the application experience is also terrible. Customize your profile/CV submit to the 'black hole' and then wait weeks with zero transparency into what happens after that, until you receive your form letter rejection weeks or months later. Job boards are a mess, littered with jobs that are not not viable & why they allow it on their platforms, diluting the reliability of their product I have NO idea. I've led TA teams for more than 10 years, and I would LOVE to work on this problem as a subject matter expert. AI & automation could help with this in variety of ways. It's an area that is DYING for disruption.
Founder @ TruAnon — distributed identity confirmation platform
also, a job board that is not mostly fake posts for harvesting your private data.
If anyone wants to solve this, A.I. can "make sense" of unordered data in both job posts and applicant resumes -- it can ask "would a job like this? or how about one like this?" and same for the recruiter.
Jobs are "fussy" to computers, traditional computing requires highly ordered data and A.I. in a fundamental way disrupts this, it can order data so traditional computing can act on a CV or Job Post.
This is the future for sure. As for stopping the scam posts? I can help you do that today if you like, please reach out:
https://jtayler.medium.com/the-scourge-of-fake-job-posts-stealing-identities-selling-reputations-3ec0ff7ae3e4
CEO | Founder | Managing Partner @ Platform Venture Studio
@Steve Heyman
Operations & Strategy
+1000 on this, from the flip side of verified job openings for real candidates. There are so many ghost postings out there it's made the layoff and job search process extremely soul sucking. And in a tight hiring market (regardless of jobs reports the last few years, it's been tough!) a person's individual network may not be able to help.
Founder @ TruAnon — distributed identity confirmation platform
indeed. (no pun!)
Totally agree candidates need help as well, can't tell if a job is real, so doesn't make sense spending 5-20 minutes applying.
Founder @ Haystack Field
Makes one wonder if a company respects the job seeker at all... 20 minutes in some cases, is being kind in terms of application time.
The Haystack team and I will continue on our path.